Trouble in paradise: Mass layoffs at private universities continue as the pandemic rages
Tuesday, February 9, 2021

Photo: Brook McArdle, for The National Catholic Reporter
Trouble in Paradise: Mass layoffs at private universities continue as the pandemic rages
By Aaron Padilla
In late November of 2020, a group called the Coalition of Jesuit Higher Education Workers and Students organized against austerity measures enacted by Jesuit universities hoping to ease the financial blow caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The coalition’s petition called for a moratorium on job and pay cuts, demanding that Jesuit universities “seek all other avenues of ‘fiscal solvency.’” The petition also advocated for staff and faculty oversight of budget decisions, greater budget transparency, a fair process for unionization, and to give faculty the choice of how they wish to work during the pandemic.
The petition additionally emphasized that the firing of such workers and faculty was in violation of the Jesuit value of “cura personalis,” which holds that Jesuits have a commitment to the nurturing and care of the spirit, intellect, and body. The Coalition extended the interpretation of “cura personalis” to mean that this care is extended to all students, workers, and faculty who make up Jesuit institutions.
The Provost’s office at LMU stated that austerity measures were taken to provide additional student aid in an email.
“The [student aid] funding comes from budget reductions, employee furloughs, executive pay cuts, and other sacrifices made by faculty, staff, and administrators working around-the-clock to support our students through this pandemic,” the email read.
Many ASLMU senators and body members including Vice President Elsie Mares, Speaker of the Senate Kyle Saavedra, Senator for Diversity and Inclusion Camile Orozco, and Senator at Large Sally Dean signed the petition.
Marquette University in Milwaukee received perhaps the harshest criticism among these Jesuit universities. According to Inside Higher Ed, the university laid off 225-300 faculty and staff in response to enrollment deficits and other financial shortcomings resulting from school closures.
In an email to Inside Higher Ed, a Marquette spokesperson claimed that leadership pay cuts, 403(b) suspensions, and spending reductions were not sustainable for the university.
This response fueled mass in-person protests at the university by faculty and staff. Because of these protests, petitions, and widespread criticism, Marquette entered into labor negotiations with its workers.
Other universities also faced fierce backlash, according to the National Catholic Reporter. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) is investigating Canisius College in Buffalo and threatened John Carroll University in Ohio with investigation if they enacted austerity-driven layoffs.
This pattern of austerity cuts and backlash from students and labor groups has continued as the pandemic drags on and universities endure further financial shortfall.
On Dec. 31, 2020, the University of Southern California (USC) laid off a large number of its janitorial and service employees, as well as several adjunct faculty. As a result, organized labor groups such as USC’s Student Coalition Against Labor Exploitation (USC SCALE) organized in-person protests and drafted a petition in hopes that President Carol Folt would hear their demands.
President Folt responded to SCALE via email, citing financial troubles and cut revenue streams brought on by the pandemic to justify the recent wave of layoffs. Since the start of the pandemic, USC has reported an estimated $34 million in damages and lost revenue. In response, the university furloughed and later fired employees who worked in services that made up a large portion of its revenue, such as housing, retail, and janitorial and food services.
Although the university claims that fired employees will return to work as soon as it is possible to do so and will receive the same benefits, labor groups at USC are suspicious of such claims, as many of the employees furloughed in late June were informed their contracts would expire on Dec. 31.
“In June, we informed the employees that the benefits program would expire on Dec. 31 if we were unable to return to normal campus operations. Even with six months’ notice, it is not a welcome situation,” President Folt wrote in an email to SCALE.
Stephanie Solis, a representative from USC SCALE, says that the university has been secretive and dismissive in its response to workers, faculty, and labor groups. Solis characterized Folt’s response as “generic,” delivering the same message with small alterations to all groups at risk of being laid off.
“Time and time again, throughout contract negotiations in the past, this has happened,” Solis said. “This shows its true colors, that it’s not looking out for its ‘Trojan Family’. Most workers are getting their healthcare cut off in the next couple of months, in the middle of a pandemic.”
The petition sent by USC SCALE posed alternatives to furloughing workers during the economic downturn. Signed by over 1900 students and faculty, the petition proposed liquidating assets from USC’s endowment fund, estimated to be worth nearly $5.7 billion.
In one of SCALE’s Instagram posts, SCALE highlighted the fact that the $34 million lost due to closed athletic facilities, postponed seasons, closed student housing, and closed student hospitality services is worth “less than 6/10 of 1% of the university’s endowment.”
The president’s office did not respond to Agency’s request for comment.
Promises Made, Promises Kept? A midterm analysis of the Palen-Mares Administration
Wednesday, November 25, 2020
Promises Made, Promises Kept? A midterm analysis of the Palen-Mares Administration Illustration: Daisy Daniels
By Aaron Padilla
The 2020 ASLMU elections were an exciting time for the LMU student body. After a stiff race between three unique tickets, Jack Palen and Elsie Mares ultimately emerged victorious after winning the popular vote. Eight months after their inauguration, however, the Palen-Mares administration has seen their fair share of criticism from the LMU student body.
In October, students condemned the Palen-Mares administration and current ASLMU Senate for being unrepresentative of their interests and for tolerating prejudice within ASLMU. These allegations are a rare example of civic engagement and criticism by the student body towards ASLMU.
In the wake of LMU’s transition into an online learning environment, ASLMU had to undergo several changes to keep pace with the needs of a socially distanced student body. Shifts in policy priorities and procedures had to take place to better accommodate student needs in an online environment. The Palen-Mares administration chose to distance themselves from the roles that past ASLMU Presidential administrations have taken in the past.
The Palen-Mares campaign platform was heavily rooted in the assumption that students would return to campus in Fall 2020. COVID-19 policy only appeared twice in their campaign platform, though was mentioned at length during the ASLMU 2020 election debates. These priorities soon changed after Palen and Mares were elected into office.
As LMU made its transition into online learning in Spring 2020 and later announced that it would do the same for Fall 2020, student government needed to adapt.“In the summer, when we started to realize that there wouldn’t be any room for in-person events and that it would all be online, we had to shift goals. We realized that our [in person] priorities had to take a backseat to our ‘survival work’ and supporting students,” ASLMU Vice President Elsie Mares explained.
Elaborating on this change of approach, ASLMU President Jack Palen said, “We saw our role as being the liaison between the University administration and students.”
Despite this emphasis on student support, the Palen-Mares administration faced a notable lack of agency over university education and tuition policy. As compared to other student governments—UCLA, for example, participated in collective bargaining while discussing plans for Fall 2020 learning—the Palen-Mares administration and ASLMU Senate carried little sway over LMU Executive Board proceedings and decisions over matters such as emergency student assistance, transitioning into online learning, and tuition costs.
“ASLMU is not at all of the tables that ASLMU should be at. That was something that became very apparent over the summer,” Vice President Mares said of ASLMU’s experiences with LMU’s administration this summer. Placing student-representatives in LMU administration meetings which concern them and their title has been imperative ever since.
Over the past few months, the Palen-Mares administration has placed most of its efforts into supporting student advocacy groups as well as highlighting work by student artists and entrepreneurs. Measures such as establishing an LMU Maker’s Collective, providing support to undocumented and mixed-status students in collaboration with Resilience LMU, and reaffirming LMU’s commitment to Title IX all fall under the administration’s student support initiatives.
Migrating to an online learning environment fundamentally altered the roles and responsibilities of those in student government. As such, the Palen-Mares administration had to shift their priorities from those of past ASLMU presidents. This shift from coordinating in-person activities to student advocacy was drastic, yet needed for changing times.
Social Icons